↓ Skip to main content

How Embodied Is Perceptual Decision Making? Evidence for Separate Processing of Perceptual and Motor Decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Embodied Is Perceptual Decision Making? Evidence for Separate Processing of Perceptual and Motor Decisions
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.2334-12.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The extent to which different cognitive processes are "embodied" is widely debated. Previous studies have implicated sensorimotor regions such as lateral intraparietal (LIP) area in perceptual decision making. This has led to the view that perceptual decisions are embodied in the same sensorimotor networks that guide body movements. We use event-related fMRI and effective connectivity analysis to investigate whether the human sensorimotor system implements perceptual decisions. We show that when eye and hand motor preparation is disentangled from perceptual decisions, sensorimotor areas are not involved in accumulating sensory evidence toward a perceptual decision. Instead, inferior frontal cortex increases its effective connectivity with sensory regions representing the evidence, is modulated by the amount of evidence, and shows greater task-positive BOLD responses during the perceptual decision stage. Once eye movement planning can begin, however, an intraparietal sulcus (IPS) area, putative LIP, participates in motor decisions. Moreover, sensory evidence levels modulate decision and motor preparation stages differently in different IPS regions, suggesting functional heterogeneity of the IPS. This suggests that different systems implement perceptual versus motor decisions, using different neural signatures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 4 1%
Italy 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 249 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 25%
Researcher 67 24%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 32%
Neuroscience 52 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 6%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 41 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2013.
All research outputs
#9,306,830
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#10,163
of 23,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,479
of 343,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#140
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.