↓ Skip to main content

English Language Proficiency and Early School Attainment Among Children Learning English as an Additional Language

Overview of attention for article published in Child Development, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
English Language Proficiency and Early School Attainment Among Children Learning English as an Additional Language
Published in
Child Development, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/cdev.12615
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Children learning English as an additional language (EAL) often experience lower academic attainment than monolingual peers. In this study, teachers provided ratings of English language proficiency and social, emotional, and behavioral functioning for 782 children with EAL and 6,485 monolingual children in reception year (ages 4-5). Academic attainment was assessed in reception and Year 2 (ages 6-7). Relative to monolingual peers with comparable English language proficiency, children with EAL displayed fewer social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties in reception, were equally likely to meet curriculum targets in reception, and were more likely to meet targets in Year 2. Academic attainment and social, emotional, and behavioral functioning in children with EAL are associated with English language proficiency at school entry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 221 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 79 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 19%
Social Sciences 34 15%
Linguistics 21 9%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 92 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#880,118
of 30,038,132 outputs
Outputs from Child Development
#481
of 4,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,243
of 332,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Development
#24
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,038,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.