↓ Skip to main content

Developmental differences in auditory detection and localization of approaching vehicles

Overview of attention for article published in Accident Analysis & Prevention, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Developmental differences in auditory detection and localization of approaching vehicles
Published in
Accident Analysis & Prevention, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pedestrian safety is a significant problem in the United States, with thousands being injured each year. Multiple risk factors exist, but one poorly understood factor is pedestrians' ability to attend to vehicles using auditory cues. Auditory information in the pedestrian setting is increasing in importance with the growing number of quieter hybrid and all-electric vehicles on America's roadways that do not emit sound cues pedestrians expect from an approaching vehicle. Our study explored developmental differences in pedestrians' detection and localization of approaching vehicles. Fifty children ages 6-9 years, and 35 adults participated. Participants' performance varied significantly by age, and with increasing speed and direction of the vehicle's approach. Results underscore the importance of understanding children's and adults' use of auditory cues for pedestrian safety and highlight the need for further research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 32%
Psychology 9 12%
Computer Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,769,895
of 27,515,430 outputs
Outputs from Accident Analysis & Prevention
#719
of 4,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,193
of 299,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accident Analysis & Prevention
#22
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,515,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.