↓ Skip to main content

The Interpretation of “Likely” Depends on the Context, but “70%” Is 70%—Right? The Influence of Associative Processes on Perceived Certainty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Interpretation of “Likely” Depends on the Context, but “70%” Is 70%—Right? The Influence of Associative Processes on Perceived Certainty
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 1999
DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Taiwan 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Researcher 14 17%
Professor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 36%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#24,751,637
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#1,195
of 3,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,721
of 155,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.