| Title |
Revolutionising participants' health and wellbeing through neuro-reprogramming via the Slimpod® app: a randomised controlled trial.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x711701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Kyle, Stephen Jones, Sandra Roycroft-Davis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#516,824
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#213
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,783
of 403,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.