↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Effectiveness of a multidimensional approach for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in 11 adult intensive care units from 10 cities of Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial…

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a multidimensional approach for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in 11 adult intensive care units from 10 cities of Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
Published in
Infection, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s15010-013-0407-1
Pubmed ID
23355330
Authors

H. Leblebicioglu, A. N. Yalcin, V. D. Rosenthal, I. Koksal, F. Sirmatel, S. Unal, H. Turgut, D. Ozdemir, G. Ersoz, C. Uzun, S. Ulusoy, S. Esen, F. Ulger, A. Dilek, H. Yilmaz, O. Turhan, N. Gunay, E. Gumus, O. Dursun, G. Yýlmaz, S. Kaya, H. Ulusoy, M. Cengiz, L. Yilmaz, G. Yildirim, A. Topeli, S. Sacar, H. Sungurtekin, D. Uğurcan, M. F. Geyik, A. Şahin, S. Erdogan, A. Kaya, N. Kuyucu, B. Arda, F. Bacakoglu

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) multidimensional approach on the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in adult patients hospitalized in 11 intensive care units (ICUs), from 10 hospitals, members of the INICC, in 10 cities of Turkey.

View on publisher site

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 35 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 42 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2024.
All research outputs
#6,078,912
of 29,400,575 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#440
of 1,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,154
of 305,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,400,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.