↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Atlas-based shape analysis and classification of retinal optical coherence tomography images using the functional shape (fshape) framework
Published in
Medical Image Analysis, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We propose a novel approach for quantitative shape variability analysis in retinal optical coherence tomography images using the functional shape (fshape) framework. The fshape framework uses surface geometry together with functional measures, such as retinal layer thickness defined on the layer surface, for registration across anatomical shapes. This is used to generate a population mean template of the geometry-function measures from each individual. Shape variability across multiple retinas can be measured by the geometrical deformation and functional residual between the template and each of the observations. To demonstrate the clinical relevance and application of the framework, we generated atlases of the inner layer surface and layer thickness of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) of glaucomatous and normal subjects, visualizing detailed spatial pattern of RNFL loss in glaucoma. Additionally, a regularized linear discriminant analysis classifier was used to automatically classify glaucoma, glaucoma-suspect, and control cases based on RNFL fshape metrics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 33%
Computer Science 9 23%
Mathematics 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical Image Analysis
#1,368
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,873
of 327,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Image Analysis
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.