↓ Skip to main content

Can Infections Cause Alzheimer's Disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologic Reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can Infections Cause Alzheimer's Disease?
Published in
Epidemiologic Reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxs007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent cause of dementia among older adults, yet more than a century of research has not determined why this disease develops. One prevailing hypothesis is that late-onset AD is caused by infectious pathogens, an idea widely studied in both humans and experimental animal models. This review examines the infectious AD etiology hypothesis and summarizes existing evidence associating infectious agents with AD in humans. The various mechanisms through which different clinical and subclinical infections could cause or promote the progression of AD are considered, as is the concordance between putative infectious agents and the epidemiology of AD. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases for research articles pertaining to infections and AD and systematically reviewed the evidence linking specific infectious pathogens to AD. The evidence compiled from the literature linking AD to an infectious cause is inconclusive, but the amount of evidence suggestive of an association is too substantial to ignore. Epidemiologic, clinical, and basic science studies that could improve on current understanding of the associations between AD and infections and possibly uncover ways to control this highly prevalent and debilitating disease are suggested.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 18 8%
Other 11 5%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 9%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 70 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,792,360
of 31,990,159 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologic Reviews
#151
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,012
of 324,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologic Reviews
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,990,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.