↓ Skip to main content

The Roles and Interactions of Symbiont, Host and Environment in Defining Coral Fitness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Roles and Interactions of Symbiont, Host and Environment in Defining Coral Fitness
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006364
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reef-building corals live in symbiosis with a diverse range of dinoflagellate algae (genus Symbiodinium) that differentially influence the fitness of the coral holobiont. The comparative role of symbiont type in holobiont fitness in relation to host genotype or the environment, however, is largely unknown. We addressed this knowledge gap by manipulating host-symbiont combinations and comparing growth, survival and thermal tolerance among the resultant holobionts in different environments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 381 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 23%
Researcher 68 17%
Student > Master 64 16%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 4%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 50%
Environmental Science 64 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 7%
Unspecified 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 80 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,068,857
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,898
of 224,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,076
of 172,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#224
of 648 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 648 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.