↓ Skip to main content

Base-specific sequences that bias somatic hypermutation deduced by analysis of out-of-frame human IgVH genes.

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Base-specific sequences that bias somatic hypermutation deduced by analysis of out-of-frame human IgVH genes.
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, March 1998
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.160.5.2360
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Somatic hypermutation introduces mutations into IgV genes during affinity maturation of the B cell response. Mutations are introduced nonrandomly, and are generally targeted to the complementarity determining regions (CDRs). Subsequent selection against mutations that result in lower affinity or nonfunctional Ig increases the relative number of mutations in the CDRs. Investigation of somatic hypermutation is hampered by the effects of selection. We have avoided this by studying out-of-frame human IgVH4.21 and 251 genes, which, being unused alleles, are unselected. By comparison of the frequency of A, C, G, and T nucleotides at positions -3 to +3 around mutated or unmutated A, C, and G nucleotides, we have identified flanking sequences that most commonly surround mutated bases. Distinct trends in flanking sequences that were unique for each base were observed. Statistically significant trends that were common to both IgVH4.21 and 251 were used to deduce motifs that bias somatic hypermutation. The motifs deduced from this data, with targeted bases in regular type, are AANB, WDCH, and DGHD (where W = A/T, B = C/G/T, D = A/G/T, H = A/C/T, and N = any base). Mutations from C and G in two further groups of out-of-frame human IgVH genes, not used in the deduction of the motifs, occurred significantly within the motifs for C and G. The proposed target sequence for G is within the reverse complement of the target sequence for C, suggesting that the hypermutation mechanism may target only G or C. The mutation in the complementary base would appear on the other strand following replication.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Professor 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Physics and Astronomy 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#12,347,312
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#19,084
of 35,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,542
of 46,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#164
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.