↓ Skip to main content

From streets to streams: Assessing the toxicity potential of urban sediment by particle size

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From streets to streams: Assessing the toxicity potential of urban sediment by particle size
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.094
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R. Selbig, Roger Bannerman, Steven R. Corsi

Abstract

Urban sediment can act as a transport mechanism for a variety of pollutants to move towards a receiving water body. The concentrations of these pollutants oftentimes exceed levels that are toxic to aquatic organisms. Many treatment structures are designed to capture coarse sediment but do not work well to similarly capture the fines. This study measured concentrations of select trace metals and PAHs in both the silt and sand fractions of urban sediment from four sources: stormwater bed, stormwater suspended, street dirt, and streambed. Concentrations were used to assess the toxic potential of sediment based on published sediment quality guidelines. All sources of sediment showed some level of toxic potential with stormwater bed sediment the highest followed by stormwater suspended, street dirt, and streambed. Both metal and PAH concentration distributions were highly correlated between the four sampling locations suggesting the presence of one or perhaps only a few sources of these pollutants which remain persistent as sediment is transported from street to stream. Comparison to other forms of combustion- and vehicle-related sources of PAHs revealed coal tar sealants to have the strongest correlation, in both the silt and sand fractions, at all four sampling sites. This information is important for environmental managers when selecting the most appropriate Best Management Practice (BMP) as a way to mitigate pollution conveyed in urban stormwater from source to sink.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 38%
Engineering 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#23,082
of 29,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,580
of 288,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#110
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.