↓ Skip to main content

An Intervention to Decrease Intravaginal Practices in HIV-Infected Women in Zambia: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Intervention to Decrease Intravaginal Practices in HIV-Infected Women in Zambia: A Pilot Study
Published in
JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jana.2012.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Intravaginal practices (IVP) are those in which women introduce products inside the vagina for hygienic, health, or sexuality reasons. IVP are associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) and potentially implicated in HIV transmission. This report presents the results of a pilot study of a behavioral intervention to decrease IVP in HIV-infected women in Zambia. At baseline, all of the enrolled women (n =40) engaged in IVP and rates of BV were high. Women receiving the intervention reported a decrease of the insertion of water and cloths inside the vagina. Communication with sexual partners regarding IVP was higher for women receiving the intervention. Results from this study suggest that a behavioral intervention could decrease IVP in HIV-infected women in Zambia and this may have an impact in decreasing HIV transmission from women to sexual partners and newborns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 26%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Psychology 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,740,792
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
#486
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,401
of 349,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.