↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and genomic learning needs of oncologists and oncology nurses in the era of precision medicine: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Personalized Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic and genomic learning needs of oncologists and oncology nurses in the era of precision medicine: a scoping review
Published in
Personalized Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.2217/pme-2021-0096
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetic and genomic data are increasingly guiding clinical care for cancer patients. To meet the growing demand for precision medicine, patient-facing oncology staff will be a part of leading the provision of genomic testing. A scoping review was undertaken to identify the range of genetic and genomic learning needs of oncologists and oncology nurses. Learning needs were reported relating to interpretation of genomic data, clinical decision-making, patient communication and counseling, and fundamentals of genetics and genomics. There was a lack of empirical research specific to oncology nurses and their learning needs in tumor sequencing. Our findings suggest that oncologists and oncology nurses need tailored support, education and training to improve their confidence and skills in adopting genomic testing into clinical practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 14 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 14 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,385,298
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Personalized Medicine
#218
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,047
of 533,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personalized Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.