↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antimicrobial Properties of Tris(homoleptic) Ruthenium(II) 2‑Pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole “Click” Complexes against Pathogenic Bacteria, Including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, September 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01574
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A series of tris(homoleptic) ruthenium(II) complexes of 2-(1-R-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyridine "click" ligands (R-pytri) with various aliphatic (R = butyl, hexyl, octyl, dodecyl, and hexdecyl) and aromatic (R = phenyl and benzyl) substituents was synthesized in good yields (52%-66%). The [Ru(R-pytri)3](2+)(X(-))2 complexes (where X(-) = PF6(-) or Cl(-)) were characterized by elemental analysis, high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS), (1)H and (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and infrared (IR) spectroscopies, and the molecular structures of six of the compounds confirmed by X-ray crystallography. (1)H NMR analysis showed that the as-synthesized materials were a statistical mixture of the mer- and fac-[Ru(R-pytri)3](2+) complexes. These diastereomers were separated using column chromatography. The electronic structures of the mer- and fac-[Ru(R-pytri)3](2+) complexes were examined using ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy and cyclic and differential pulse voltammetry. The family of R-pytri ligands and the corresponding mer- and fac-[Ru(R-pytri)3](2+) complexes were tested for antimicrobial activity in vitro against both Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteria. Agar-based disk diffusion assays indicated that two of the [Ru(R-pytri)3](X)2 complexes (where X = PF6(-) and R = hexyl or octyl) displayed good antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive S. aureus and no activity against Gram-negative E. coli at the concentrations tested. The most active [Ru(R-pytri)3](2+) complexes ([Ru(hexpytri)3](2+) and Ru(octpytri)3](2+)) were converted to the water-soluble chloride salts and screened for their activity against a wider range of pathogenic bacteria. As with the preliminary screen, the complexes showed good activity against a variety of Gram-positive strains (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 1-8 μg/mL) but were less effective against Gram-negative bacteria (MIC = 16-128 μg/mL). Most interestingly, in some cases, the ruthenium(II) "click" complexes proved more active (MIC = 4-8 μg/mL) than the gentamicin control (MIC = 16 μg/mL) against two strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (MR 4393 and MR 4549). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments and propidium iodide assays suggested that the main mode of action for the ruthenium(II) R-pytri complexes was cell wall/cytoplasmic membrane disruption. Cytotoxicity experiments on human dermal keratinocyte and Vero (African green monkey kidney epithelial) cell lines suggested that the complexes were only modestly cytotoxic at concentrations well above the MIC values.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 48 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,990,008
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#10,898
of 21,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,720
of 321,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#64
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.