↓ Skip to main content

52 Genetic Loci Influencing Myocardial Mass

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users
patent
1 patent
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
52 Genetic Loci Influencing Myocardial Mass
Published in
JACC, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pim van der Harst, Jessica van Setten, Niek Verweij, Georg Vogler, Lude Franke, Matthew T. Maurano, Xinchen Wang, Irene Mateo Leach, Mark Eijgelsheim, Nona Sotoodehnia, Caroline Hayward, Rossella Sorice, Osorio Meirelles, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Ozren Polašek, Toshiko Tanaka, Dan E. Arking, Sheila Ulivi, Stella Trompet, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Albert V. Smith, Marcus Dörr, Kathleen F. Kerr, Jared W. Magnani, Fabiola Del Greco M., Weihua Zhang, Ilja M. Nolte, Claudia T. Silva, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Vinicius Tragante, Tõnu Esko, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Michiel E. Adriaens, Karl Andersen, Phil Barnett, Joshua C. Bis, Rolf Bodmer, Brendan M. Buckley, Harry Campbell, Megan V. Cannon, Aravinda Chakravarti, Lin Y. Chen, Alessandro Delitala, Richard B. Devereux, Pieter A. Doevendans, Anna F. Dominiczak, Luigi Ferrucci, Ian Ford, Christian Gieger, Tamara B. Harris, Eric Haugen, Matthias Heinig, Dena G. Hernandez, Hans L. Hillege, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Albert Hofman, Norbert Hubner, Shih-Jen Hwang, Annamaria Iorio, Mika Kähönen, Manolis Kellis, Ivana Kolcic, Ishminder K. Kooner, Jaspal S. Kooner, Jan A. Kors, Edward G. Lakatta, Kasper Lage, Lenore J. Launer, Daniel Levy, Alicia Lundby, Peter W. Macfarlane, Dalit May, Thomas Meitinger, Andres Metspalu, Stefania Nappo, Silvia Naitza, Shane Neph, Alex S. Nord, Teresa Nutile, Peter M. Okin, Jesper V. Olsen, Ben A. Oostra, Josef M. Penninger, Len A. Pennacchio, Tune H. Pers, Siegfried Perz, Annette Peters, Yigal M. Pinto, Arne Pfeufer, Maria Grazia Pilia, Peter P. Pramstaller, Bram P. Prins, Olli T. Raitakari, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Ken M. Rice, Elizabeth J. Rossin, Jerome I. Rotter, Sebastian Schafer, David Schlessinger, Carsten O. Schmidt, Jobanpreet Sehmi, Herman H.W. Silljé, Gianfranco Sinagra, Moritz F. Sinner, Kamil Slowikowski, Elsayed Z. Soliman, Timothy D. Spector, Wilko Spiering, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Ronald P. Stolk, Konstantin Strauch, Sian-Tsung Tan, Kirill V. Tarasov, Bosco Trinh, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Malou van den Boogaard, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Wiek H. van Gilst, Jorma S. Viikari, Peter M. Visscher, Veronique Vitart, Uwe Völker, Melanie Waldenberger, Christian X. Weichenberger, Harm-Jan Westra, Cisca Wijmenga, Bruce H. Wolffenbuttel, Jian Yang, Connie R. Bezzina, Patricia B. Munroe, Harold Snieder, Alan F. Wright, Igor Rudan, Laurie A. Boyer, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Bruno H. Stricker, Bruce M. Psaty, Marina Ciullo, Serena Sanna, Terho Lehtimäki, James F. Wilson, Stefania Bandinelli, Alvaro Alonso, Paolo Gasparini, J. Wouter Jukema, Stefan Kääb, Vilmundur Gudnason, Stephan B. Felix, Susan R. Heckbert, Rudolf A. de Boer, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Andrew A. Hicks, John C. Chambers, Yalda Jamshidi, Axel Visel, Vincent M. Christoffels, Aaron Isaacs, Nilesh J. Samani, Paul I.W. de Bakker

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 248 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Professor 16 6%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 62 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Computer Science 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 75 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2026.
All research outputs
#706,338
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,732
of 22,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,920
of 338,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#25
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.