↓ Skip to main content

Asthma and lung structure on computed tomography: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Lung Study

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Asthma and lung structure on computed tomography: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Lung Study
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.036
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The potential consequences of asthma in childhood and young adulthood on lung structure in older adults have not been studied in a large, population-based cohort.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 2 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2026.
All research outputs
#861,190
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#707
of 14,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,800
of 344,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.