↓ Skip to main content

Basal insulin peglispro versus insulin glargine in insulin‐naïve type 2 diabetes: IMAGINE 2 randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Basal insulin peglispro versus insulin glargine in insulin‐naïve type 2 diabetes: IMAGINE 2 randomized trial
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/dom.12712
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Basal insulin peglispro is a long-acting insulin analog with hepato-preferential action. This double-blind, randomized, multi-national study compared 52- or 78-week treatment with basal insulin peglispro or insulin glargine, added to pre-study oral antihyperglycemic medications, in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes. Primary outcome was noninferiority of peglispro to glargine in HbA1c reduction (margin=0.4%). Six gated secondary objectives with statistical multiplicity adjustments assessed other measures of glycemic control. Liver fat content was measured by MRI, in a subset of patients. Peglispro was noninferior to glargine in HbA1c reduction (least-squares mean difference: -0.29% [95%CI: -0.40, -0.19]), and had a lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rate (relative rate [RR]: 0.74 [0.60, 0.91]; p=0.005), more patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% without nocturnal hypoglycemia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.15 [1.60, 2.89], p<0.001), greater HbA1c reduction (p<0.001), and more patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% (OR: 1.97 [95%CI: 1.57, 2.47], p<0.001). Total hypoglycemia rate and fasting serum glucose did not achieve statistical superiority. At 52 weeks, peglispro-treated patients had higher triglycerides (169 vs 151 mg/dL), ALT (34 vs 27 IU/L), and AST (27 vs 24 IU/L). Least-squares mean liver fat content was unchanged with BIL at 52 weeks but decreased 3.1% with glargine (difference: 2.6% [0.9, 4.2]; p=0.002). More peglispro-treated patients experienced adverse injection site reactions (3.5% vs 0.6%, p<0.001). Compared to glargine at 52 weeks, peglispro showed statistically superior reduction in HbA1c, more patients achieving HbA1c targets, less nocturnal hypoglycemia, no improvement in total hypoglycemia, higher triglycerides, higher aminotransferases, and more injection site reactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 35 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#5,823
of 6,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,630
of 335,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#54
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.