↓ Skip to main content

Embodied participation: What multimodal analysis can tell us about interpreter-mediated encounters in pedagogical settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pragmatics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Embodied participation: What multimodal analysis can tell us about interpreter-mediated encounters in pedagogical settings
Published in
Journal of Pragmatics, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.008
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 37 40%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Arts and Humanities 7 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Design 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,156,724
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pragmatics
#680
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,933
of 423,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pragmatics
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.