↓ Skip to main content

Promiscuous antibodies characterised by their physico-chemical properties: From sequence to structure and back

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Promiscuous antibodies characterised by their physico-chemical properties: From sequence to structure and back
Published in
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human B cells produce antibodies, which bind to their cognate antigen based on distinct molecular properties of the antibody CDR loop. We have analysed a set of 10 antibodies showing a clear difference in their binding properties to a panel of antigens, resulting in two subsets of antibodies with a distinct binding phenotype. We call the observed binding multiplicity 'promiscuous' and selected physico-chemical CDRH3 characteristics and conformational preferences may characterise these promiscuous antibodies. To classify CDRH3 physico-chemical properties playing a role in their binding properties, we used statistical analyses of the sequences annotated by Kidera factors. To characterise structure-function requirements for antigen binding multiplicity we employed Molecular Modelling and Monte Carlo based coarse-grained simulations. The ability to predict the molecular causes of promiscuous, multi-binding behaviour would greatly improve the efficiency of the therapeutic antibody discovery process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#28,602,152
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#883
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,332
of 333,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.