↓ Skip to main content

Shoulder Muscle Recruitment Patterns and Related Biomechanics during Upper Extremity Sports

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
838 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Shoulder Muscle Recruitment Patterns and Related Biomechanics during Upper Extremity Sports
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200939070-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding when and how much shoulder muscles are active during upper extremity sports is helpful to physicians, therapists, trainers and coaches in providing appropriate treatment, training and rehabilitation protocols to these athletes. This review focuses on shoulder muscle activity (rotator cuff, deltoids, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, triceps and biceps brachii, and scapular muscles) during the baseball pitch, the American football throw, the windmill softball pitch, the volleyball serve and spike, the tennis serve and volley, baseball hitting, and the golf swing. Because shoulder electromyography (EMG) data are far more extensive for overhead throwing activities compared with non-throwing upper extremity sports, much of this review focuses on shoulder EMG during the overhead throwing motion. Throughout this review shoulder kinematic and kinetic data (when available) are integrated with shoulder EMG data to help better understand why certain muscles are active during different phases of an activity, what type of muscle action (eccentric or concentric) occurs, and to provide insight into the shoulder injury mechanism. Kinematic, kinetic and EMG data have been reported extensively during overhead throwing, such as baseball pitching and football passing. Because shoulder forces, torques and muscle activity are generally greatest during the arm cocking and arm deceleration phases of overhead throwing, it is believed that most shoulder injuries occur during these phases. During overhead throwing, high rotator cuff muscle activity is generated to help resist the high shoulder distractive forces approximately 80-120% bodyweight during the arm cocking and deceleration phases. During arm cocking, peak rotator cuff activity is 49-99% of a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in baseball pitching and 41-67% MVIC in football throwing. During arm deceleration, peak rotator cuff activity is 37-84% MVIC in baseball pitching and 86-95% MVIC in football throwing. Peak rotator cuff activity is also high is the windmill softball pitch (75-93% MVIC), the volleyball serve and spike (54-71% MVIC), the tennis serve and volley (40-113% MVIC), baseball hitting (28-39% MVIC), and the golf swing (28-68% MVIC). Peak scapular muscle activity is also high during the arm cocking and arm deceleration phases of baseball pitching, with peak serratus anterior activity 69-106% MVIC, peak upper, middle and lower trapezius activity 51-78% MVIC, peak rhomboids activity 41-45% MVIC, and peak levator scapulae activity 33-72% MVIC. Moreover, peak serratus anterior activity was approximately 60% MVIC during the windmill softball pitch, approximately 75% MVIC during the tennis serve and forehand and backhand volley, approximately 30-40% MVIC during baseball hitting, and approximately 70% MVIC during the golf swing. In addition, during the golf swing, peak upper, middle and lower trapezius activity was 42-52% MVIC, peak rhomboids activity was approximately 60% MVIC, and peak levator scapulae activity was approximately 60% MVIC.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 838 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 818 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 141 17%
Student > Bachelor 113 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 8%
Other 53 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 166 20%
Unknown 247 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 205 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 182 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 10%
Engineering 36 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 4%
Other 37 4%
Unknown 265 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,142
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,486
of 192,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#464
of 831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.