↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of the African American Women’s Shifting Scale (AAWSS)

Overview of attention for article published in Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development and Validation of the African American Women’s Shifting Scale (AAWSS)
Published in
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.1037/cdp0000039
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop and validate an instrument to measure shifting or self-altering strategies among African American women. A 13-item instrument was developed to measure aspects of shifting phenomena based on the empirical literature, feedback from focus groups, and cultural experts. The initial validation study, using principal axis analysis, was conducted with a national sample of 318 African American women. A second independent national sample of 190 African American women provided data for a confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated that the inventory was composed of the following 3 factors: Strong Black Woman, Awareness of Shifting Behavior, and Sensitivity to the Perceptions of Blacks. A structural model was developed based on the Multicultural Assessment-Intervention Process (MAIP) framework that allowed for the exploration of the shifting construct. Implications for future research are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 35%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,771,544
of 27,248,354 outputs
Outputs from Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
#538
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,269
of 405,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,248,354 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.