You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumor ENPP1 (CD203a)/Haptoglobin Axis Exploits Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells to Promote Post-Radiotherapy Local Recurrence in Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Borja Ruiz-Fernández de Córdoba, Haritz Moreno, Karmele Valencia, Naiara Perurena, Pablo Ruedas, Thomas Walle, Alberto Pezonaga-Torres, Juan Hinojosa, Elisabet Guruceaga, Antonio Pineda-Lucena, Marta Abengózar-Muela, Denis Cochonneau, Carolina Zandueta, Susana Martínez-Canarias, Álvaro Teijeira, Daniel Ajona, Sergio Ortiz-Espinosa, Xabier Morales, Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano, Marta Santisteban, Luis I. Ramos-García, Laura Guembe, Vratislav Strnad, Dominique Heymann, Sandra Hervás-Stubbs, Rubén Pío, María E. Rodríguez-Ruiz, Carlos E. de Andrea, Silvestre Vicent, Ignacio Melero, Fernando Lecanda, Rafael Martínez-Monge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 49 | 39% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 91% |
| Scientists | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#355,063
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#176
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,230
of 452,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#13
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.