↓ Skip to main content

Femtosecond-Assisted Big Bubble

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Femtosecond-Assisted Big Bubble
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, December 2016
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000001004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of femtosecond laser-assisted (FA) tunnel creation as a pretreatment for creating a big bubble (BB) to pneumo-dissect the corneal stroma from Descemet membrane. Five human cadaver eyes received pretreatment using a femtosecond laser. An intrastromal tunnel, along with a side cut, was achieved using customized femtosecond corneal disruption (custom mask). Before treatment, optical coherence tomography was performed and the intrastromal tunnel was intended to achieve a parallel orientation with respect to the corneal endothelial cell layer (50 µm above the endothelium). Surgical dissection of the side cut using a Sinskey hook was performed, followed by insertion of a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty cannula into the tunnel and pneumo-dissection (BB). All corneas after treatment were prepared for histologic evaluation (light microscopy). FA pretreatment was successful in all 5 cadaveric corneas, and the BB was achieved in all eyes as well. Histologic evaluation of the corneas revealed complete separation of Descemet membrane and stroma in all eyes, with no remaining stroma attached to Descemet membrane and no signs of perforation. FABB seems feasible because pneumo-dissection of the corneal stroma from Descemet membrane was achieved in all human cadaver corneas of this experimental study. Optical coherence tomography, corneal histology, and macroscopic evaluation revealed complete Descemet-stromal separation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 25%
Student > Postgraduate 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Mathematics 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#27,729,878
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#2,403
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,001
of 452,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.