↓ Skip to main content

Histologic, Biomechanical, and Biological Evaluation of Fan‐Folded Iliotibial Band Allografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Histologic, Biomechanical, and Biological Evaluation of Fan‐Folded Iliotibial Band Allografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published in
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to thoroughly characterize the fan-folded iliotibial band (FITB) allograft and compare it with anterior tibialis tendons (ATs) and native anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) to determine whether it measures up to those tissues.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#24,918,520
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#4,091
of 5,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,750
of 344,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#58
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.