| Title |
Protocol: optimising hydroponic growth systems for nutritional and physiological analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and other plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-9-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon J Conn, Bradleigh Hocking, Maclin Dayod, Bo Xu, Asmini Athman, Sam Henderson, Lucy Aukett, Vanessa Conn, Monique K Shearer, Sigfredo Fuentes, Stephen D Tyerman, Matthew Gilliham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 499 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 479 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 82 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 13% |
| Researcher | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 263 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 59 | 12% |
| Engineering | 19 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Unknown | 103 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,678,088
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#70
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,401
of 290,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.