↓ Skip to main content

「「高等学校国語・新学習指導要領」に関する見解」の経緯と背景

Overview of attention for article published in Modern Japanese Literary Studies, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「「高等学校国語・新学習指導要領」に関する見解」の経緯と背景
Published in
Modern Japanese Literary Studies, November 2021
DOI 10.19018/nihonkindaibungaku.103.0_81
Authors

安藤 宏

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Modern Japanese Literary Studies
#48
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,507
of 433,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Japanese Literary Studies
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them