↓ Skip to main content

Collective Efficacy and Team Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Collegiate Football Teams

Overview of attention for article published in Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Collective Efficacy and Team Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Collegiate Football Teams
Published in
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , June 2004
DOI 10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nicaragua 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 24%
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 29%
Sports and Recreations 28 17%
Social Sciences 23 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 9%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#24,756,003
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#235
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,911
of 88,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them