↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Surgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study
Published in
International Journal of Surgery, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Other 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#26,683,006
of 32,266,838 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Surgery
#2,394
of 3,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,756
of 269,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Surgery
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,266,838 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.