↓ Skip to main content

The pediatric hydroxyurea phase III clinical trial (BABY HUG): Challenges of study design

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Blood and Cancer, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The pediatric hydroxyurea phase III clinical trial (BABY HUG): Challenges of study design
Published in
Pediatric Blood and Cancer, September 2009
DOI 10.1002/pbc.22269
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence of the laboratory benefits of hydroxyurea and its clinical efficacy in reducing acute vaso-occlusive events in adults and children with sickle cell anemia has accumulated for more than 15 years. A definitive clinical trial showing that hydroxyurea can also prevent organ damage might support widespread use of the drug at an early age. BABY HUG is a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test whether treating young children ages 9-17 months at entry with a liquid preparation of hydroxyurea (20 mg/kg/day for 2 years) can decrease organ damage in the kidneys and spleen by at least 50%. Creation of BABY HUG entailed unique challenges and opportunities. Although protection of brain function might be considered a more compelling endpoint, preservation of spleen and renal function has clinical relevance, and significant treatment effects might be discernable within the mandated sample size of 200. Concerns about unanticipated severe toxicity and burdensome testing and monitoring requirements were addressed in part by an internal Feasibility and Safety Pilot Study, the successful completion of which was required prior to enrolling a larger number of children on the protocol. Concerns over recruitment of potentially vulnerable subjects were allayed by inclusion of a research subject advocate, or ombudsman. Finally, maintenance of blinding of research personnel was aided by inclusion of an unblinded primary endpoint person, charged with transmitting endpoint data and monitoring blood work locally for toxicity (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006400).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#28,817,066
of 34,609,551 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#5,109
of 6,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,070
of 145,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Blood and Cancer
#40
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,609,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.