| Title |
Advancing an understanding of access as ‘human fit’: A qualitative participatory case study in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0375 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Voorhees, Simon Bailey, Heather Waterman, Kath Checkland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 48% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 56% |
| Scientists | 16 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,219,835
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#557
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,663
of 517,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.