↓ Skip to main content

White Matter Abnormalities in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Psychiatry, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
White Matter Abnormalities in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
American Journal of Psychiatry, December 2012
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12050600
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It has been estimated that 10%-20% of U.S. veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan experienced mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), mostly secondary to blast exposure. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may detect subtle white matter changes in both the acute and chronic stages of mild TBI and thus has the potential to detect white matter damage in patients with TBI. The authors used DTI to examine white matter integrity in a relatively large group of veterans with a history of mild TBI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Psychology 32 20%
Neuroscience 27 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,694,988
of 29,681,729 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#1,296
of 8,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,596
of 305,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,681,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.