↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,505)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
30 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
12 Redditors
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A randomized controlled trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine
Published in
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, February 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0161-4754(00)90073-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Canada 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 245 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Other 23 9%
Other 64 24%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2025.
All research outputs
#925,464
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#42
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#931
of 159,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.