↓ Skip to main content

Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
345 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, June 2009
DOI 10.1029/2007gb003176
Authors

Elena Shevliakova, Stephen W. Pacala, Sergey Malyshev, George C. Hurtt, P. C. D. Milly, John P. Caspersen, Lori T. Sentman, Justin P. Fisk, Christian Wirth, Cyril Crevoisier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 353 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 22%
Student > Master 36 10%
Other 22 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 115 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 90 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 16%
Engineering 15 4%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 73 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2011.
All research outputs
#4,192,780
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#671
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,102
of 123,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.