↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative meta‐synthesis: the experience of chronic pain across conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Qualitative meta‐synthesis: the experience of chronic pain across conditions
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, October 2016
DOI 10.1111/jan.13174
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To synthesise qualitative descriptions of the experience of chronic pain across conditions. Chronic pain is a transdiagnostic symptom in that while somatic pathology plays a role in activating pain pathways, psychological and social factors contribute to the experience of pain over time. The treatment of the underlying condition may require both bio-medical intervention and biopsychosocial approaches. Qualitative meta-synthesis using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) developed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group to evaluate the strength of the evidence. PubMed and Ovid Medline from 2000-2015. Following a systematic search strategy all papers were assessed in relation to inclusion criteria and quality. Themes were extracted from each study and a meta-synthesis conducted before completing an evaluation of confidence in the findings. Forty-one papers exploring the experience of chronic pain were included in the review. Five meta-themes were identified across the studies: 1) the body as obstacle 2) invisible but real, 3) disrupted sense of self 4) unpredictability and 5) keeping going. There was high confidence in the evidence for three themes: 'the body as obstacle'; 'disrupted sense of self' and 'keeping going'; and moderate confidence in the evidence for 'invisible but real' and 'unpredictability'. The findings in this review suggest there are similarities in the experience of chronic pain across a range of conditions that have implications for the development of transdiagnostic pain management strategies and interventions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Psychology 22 13%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,715,588
of 33,924,920 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#1,612
of 7,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,644
of 337,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#52
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,924,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.