↓ Skip to main content

Pullosquilla pardus (Moosa, 1991) オオコドモヒメシャコ(新称)(軟甲綱:口脚目:ヒメシャコ科)の日本初記録

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pullosquilla pardus (Moosa, 1991) オオコドモヒメシャコ(新称)(軟甲綱:口脚目:ヒメシャコ科)の日本初記録
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), August 2020
DOI 10.18988/cancer.29.0_59
Authors

中島 広喜, 成瀬 貫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,626,132
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#6,534
of 14,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,695
of 427,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#93
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.