↓ Skip to main content

Spatial mismatch in diversity facets reveals contrasting protection for New Zealand's cetacean biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spatial mismatch in diversity facets reveals contrasting protection for New Zealand's cetacean biodiversity
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109484
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Environmental Science 6 20%
Computer Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#9,054,538
of 28,318,969 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,433
of 7,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,726
of 459,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#47
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,318,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.