↓ Skip to main content

Potential use of low-copy nuclear genes in DNA barcoding: a comparison with plastid genes in two Hawaiian plant radiations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Potential use of low-copy nuclear genes in DNA barcoding: a comparison with plastid genes in two Hawaiian plant radiations
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-35
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

DNA barcoding of land plants has relied traditionally on a small number of markers from the plastid genome. In contrast, low-copy nuclear genes have received little attention as DNA barcodes because of the absence of universal primers for PCR amplification.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
China 1 1%
Cameroon 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 73 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 29%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 10 12%
Lecturer 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#24,754,523
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,917
of 3,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,232
of 347,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#53
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.