You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Maintenance of Weeding Fields in The Rice Terraces of Kurumeki, Inasa-chou, Shizuoka Prefecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.5632/jila.78.707 |
| Authors |
Naruhiko KOBAYASHI, ARAI Ayumi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 14% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,163,850
of 24,699,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#2
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,924
of 363,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,699,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them