↓ Skip to main content

Network Governance for Invasive Species Management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Network Governance for Invasive Species Management
Published in
Conservation Letters, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/conl.12311
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 50 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Social Sciences 24 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 55 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,262,060
of 29,285,890 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#758
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,246
of 333,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,285,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.