| Title |
Development and external validation of a new clinical prediction model for early recognition of sepsis in adult patients in primary care: a diagnostic study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0520 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feike J Loots, Marleen Smits, Rogier M Hopstaken, Kevin Jenniskens, Fleur H Schroeten, Ann van den Bruel, Alma C van de Pol, Jan Jelrik Oosterheert, Hjalmar Bouma, Paul Little, Michael Moore, Sanne van Delft, Douwe Rijpsma, Joris Holkenborg, Bas CT van Bussel, Ralph Laven, Dennis CJJ Bergmans, Jacobien J Hoogerwerf, Gideon HP Latten, Eefje GPM de Bont, Paul Giesen, Annemarie den Harder, Ron Kusters, Arthur RH van Zanten, Theo JM Verheij |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 15% |
| Japan | 2 | 15% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#955,445
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#422
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,225
of 450,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#10
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.