↓ Skip to main content

Decoding ubiquitin for mitosis.

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Cancer, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Decoding ubiquitin for mitosis.
Published in
Genes & Cancer, February 2013
DOI 10.1177/1947601912473477
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Conjugation of ubiquitin (ubiquitination) to substrate proteins is a widespread modification that ensures fidelity of many cellular processes. During mitosis, different dynamic morphological transitions have to be coordinated in a temporal and spatial manner to allow for precise partitioning of the genetic material into two daughter cells, and ubiquitination of key mitotic factors is believed to provide both directionality and fidelity to this process. While directionality can be achieved by a proteolytic type of ubiquitination signal, the fidelity is often determined by various types of ubiquitin conjugation that does not target substrates for proteolysis by the proteasome. An additional level of complexity is provided by various ubiquitin-interacting proteins that act downstream of the ubiquitinated substrate and can serve as "decoders" for the ubiquitin signal. They may, specifically reverse ubiquitin attachment (deubiquitinating enzymes, DUBs) or, act as a receptor for transfer of the ubiquitinated substrate toward downstream signaling components and/or subcellular compartments (ubiquitin-binding proteins, UBPs). In this review, we aim at summarizing the knowledge and emerging concepts about the role of ubiquitin decoders, DUBs, and UBPs that contribute to faithful regulation of mitotic division.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 41%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2025.
All research outputs
#22,952,148
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Cancer
#271
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,363
of 343,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Cancer
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.