↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1093 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses
Published in
The Lancet, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61851-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,093 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Kenya 3 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1062 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 205 19%
Researcher 138 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 12%
Student > Bachelor 102 9%
Student > Postgraduate 65 6%
Other 192 18%
Unknown 260 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 276 25%
Social Sciences 133 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 106 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 46 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 3%
Other 183 17%
Unknown 311 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2026.
All research outputs
#633,809
of 34,393,205 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,398
of 51,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,273
of 350,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#38
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,393,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.