↓ Skip to main content

Religiosity is associated with affective and immune status in symptomatic hiv-infected gay men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychosomatic Research, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Religiosity is associated with affective and immune status in symptomatic hiv-infected gay men
Published in
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, February 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00078-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examines the relationship between religiosity and the affective and immune status of 106 HIV-seropositive mildly symptomatic gay men (CDC stage B). All men completed an intake interview, a set of psychosocial questionnaires, and provided a venous blood sample. Factor analysis of 12 religiously oriented response items revealed two distinct aspects to religiosity: religious coping and religious behavior. Religious coping (e.g., placing trust in God, seeking comfort in religion) was significantly associated with lower scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, but not with specific immune markers. On the other hand, religious behavior (e.g., service attendance, prayer, spiritual discussion, reading religious literature) was significantly associated with higher T-helper-inducer cell (CD4+) counts and higher CD4+ percentages, but not with depression. Regression analyses indicated that religiosity's associations with affective and immune status was not mediated by the subjects' sense of self-efficacy or ability to actively cope with their health situation. The associations between religiosity and affective and immune status also appear to be independent of symptom status. Self-efficacy, however, did appear to contribute uniquely and significantly to lower depression scores. Our results show that an examination considering both subject religiosity as well as sense of self-efficacy may predict depressive symptoms in HIV-infected gay men better than an examination that considers either variable in isolation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 29 30%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 24%
Social Sciences 21 22%
Unspecified 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,344,310
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#1,993
of 3,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,642
of 109,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.