↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual Load Corresponds With Factors Known to Influence Visual Search

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceptual Load Corresponds With Factors Known to Influence Visual Search
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 2013
DOI 10.1037/a0031616
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One account of the early versus late selection debate in attention proposes that perceptual load determines the locus of selection. Attention selects stimuli at a late processing level under low-load conditions but selects stimuli at an early level under high-load conditions. Despite the successes of perceptual load theory, a noncircular definition of perceptual load remains elusive. We investigated the factors that influence perceptual load by using manipulations that have been studied extensively in visual search, namely target-distractor similarity and distractor-distractor similarity. Consistent with previous work, search was most efficient when targets and distractors were dissimilar and the displays contained homogeneous distractors; search became less efficient when target-distractor similarity increased irrespective of display heterogeneity. Importantly, we used these same stimuli in a typical perceptual load task that measured attentional spillover to a task-irrelevant flanker. We found a strong correspondence between search efficiency and perceptual load; stimuli that generated efficient searches produced flanker interference effects, suggesting that such displays involved low perceptual load. Flanker interference effects were reduced in displays that produced less efficient searches. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that search difficulty, as measured by search intercept, has little bearing on perceptual load. We conclude that rather than be arbitrarily defined, perceptual load might be defined by well-characterized, continuous factors that influence visual search.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 104 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 59%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Design 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#10,711,397
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
#380
of 3,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,772
of 345,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
#14
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.