↓ Skip to main content

Developments in the field of allergy mechanisms in 2015 through the eyes of Clinical

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Developments in the field of allergy mechanisms in 2015 through the eyes of Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/cea.12823
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the first of two papers we described the development in the field of allergy mechanisms as described by Clinical and Experimental Allergy in 2015. Experimental models of allergic disease, basic mechanisms, clinical mechanisms and allergens are all covered. A second paper will cover clinical aspects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,484,484
of 31,712,529 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#867
of 4,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,671
of 323,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,712,529 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.