↓ Skip to main content

Selective Vulnerability of Senescent Glioblastoma Cells to BCL-XL Inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer Research, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective Vulnerability of Senescent Glioblastoma Cells to BCL-XL Inhibition
Published in
Molecular Cancer Research, February 2022
DOI 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masum Rahman, Ian Olson, Moustafa Mansour, Lucas P. Carlstrom, Rujapope Sutiwisesak, Rehan Saber, Karishma Rajani, Arthur E. Warrington, Adam Howard, Mark Schroeder, Sisi Chen, Paul A. Decker, Eliot F. Sananikone, Yi Zhu, Tamar Tchkonia, Ian F. Parney, Sandeep Burma, Desmond Brown, Moses Rodriguez, Jann N. Sarkaria, James L. Kirkland, Terry C. Burns

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a rapidly fatal malignancy typically treated with radiation and Temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating chemotherapeutic. These cytotoxic therapies cause oxidative stress and DNA damage, yielding a senescent-like state of replicative arrest in surviving tumor cells. Unfortunately, recurrence is inevitable, and may be driven by surviving tumor cells eventually escaping senescence. A growing number of socalled "senolytic" drugs have been recently identified that are defined by their ability to selectively eliminate senescent cells. A growing inventory of senolytic drugs are under consideration for several diseases associated with aging, inflammation, DNA damage, as well as cancer. Ablation of senescent tumor cells after radiation and chemotherapy could help mitigate recurrence by decreasing the burden of residual tumor cells at risk of recurrence. This strategy has not been previously explored for glioblastoma. We evaluated a panel of 10 previously described senolytic drugs to determine if any could exhibit selective activity against human glioblastoma persisting after exposure to radiation or TMZ. Three of the 10 drugs have known activity against BCL-XL and preferentially induced apoptosis in radiated or TMZtreated glioma. This senolytic activity was observed in 12/12 human GBM cell lines. Efficacy could not be replicated with BCL-2 inhibition or senolytic agents acting against other putative senolytic targets. Knockdown of BCL-XL decreased survival of radiated GBM cells, whereas knockdown of BCL-2 or BCL-W yielded no senolytic effect. Implications: These findings imply that molecularly heterogeneous GBM lines share selective senescence-induced Bcl-XL dependency increase the significance and translational relevance of the senolytic therapy for latent glioma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Linguistics 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,458,996
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer Research
#506
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,497
of 434,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer Research
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.