↓ Skip to main content

Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, February 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavel Raška, Nejc Bezak, Carla S S Ferreira, Zahra Kalantari, Kazimierz Banasik, Miriam Bertola, Mary Bourke, Artemi Cerdà, Peter Davids, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Rhys Evans, David C Finger, Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, Mashor Housh, Artan Hysa, Jiří Jakubínský, Marijana Kapović Solomun, Maria Kaufmann, Saskia Keesstra, Emine Keles, Silvia Kohnová, Michele Pezzagno, Kristina Potočki, Samuel Rufat, Samaneh Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, Arthur Schindelegger, Mojca Šraj, Gintautas Stankunavicius, Jannes Stolte, Ružica Stričević, Jan Szolgay, Vesna Zupanc, Lenka Slavíková, Thomas Hartmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 10 6%
Lecturer 4 2%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 84 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 12%
Engineering 17 10%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 91 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,589,368
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Management
#532
of 6,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,532
of 451,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Management
#15
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.