↓ Skip to main content

Allelic variation at a single gene increases food value in a drought-tolerant staple cereal

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Allelic variation at a single gene increases food value in a drought-tolerant staple cereal
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2450
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The production of adequate agricultural outputs to support the growing human population places great demands on agriculture, especially in light of ever-greater restrictions on input resources. Sorghum is a drought-adapted cereal capable of reliable production where other cereals fail, and thus represents a good candidate to address food security as agricultural inputs of water and arable land grow scarce. A long-standing issue with sorghum grain is that it has an inherently lower digestibility. Here we show that a low-frequency allele type in the starch metabolic gene, pullulanase, is associated with increased digestibility, regardless of genotypic background. We also provide evidence that the beneficial allele type is not associated with deleterious pleiotropic effects in the modern field environment. We argue that increasing the digestibility of an adapted crop is a viable way forward towards addressing food security while maximizing water and land-use efficiency.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Peru 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
China 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,428,173
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,940
of 46,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,130
of 287,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#95
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.