↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
GABA deficit in the visual cortex of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: genotype–phenotype correlations and functional impact
Published in
Brain, February 2013
DOI 10.1093/brain/aws368
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Alterations in the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission have been implicated in several neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurofibromatosis type 1 is one of the most common monogenic disorders causing cognitive deficits for which studies on a mouse model (Nfl(+/-)) proposed increased γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission as the neural mechanism underlying these deficits. To test whether a similar mechanism translates to the human disorder, we used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure γ-aminobutyric acid levels in the visual cortex of children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 (n = 20) and matched control subjects (n = 26). We found that patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 have significantly lower γ-aminobutyric acid levels than control subjects, and that neurofibromatosis type 1 mutation type significantly predicted cortical γ-aminobutyric acid. Moreover, functional imaging of the visual cortex indicated that blood oxygen level-dependent signal was correlated with γ-aminobutyric acid levels both in patients and control subjects. Our results provide in vivo evidence of γ-aminobutyric acidergic dysfunction in neurofibromatosis type 1 by showing a reduction in γ-aminobutyric acid levels in human patients. This finding is relevant to understand the physiological profile of the disorder and has implications for the identification of targets for therapeutic strategies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Neuroscience 20 16%
Psychology 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2013.
All research outputs
#22,643,883
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#7,245
of 7,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,774
of 300,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#90
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.