↓ Skip to main content

Does biomass growth increase in the largest trees? Flaws, fallacies and alternative analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does biomass growth increase in the largest trees? Flaws, fallacies and alternative analyses
Published in
Functional Ecology, November 2016
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12775
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 198 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Master 25 12%
Professor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 36%
Environmental Science 60 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 3 1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,379,820
of 32,066,226 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#819
of 3,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,730
of 322,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,066,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.